Open Carry Laws Benefit Public Safety? – A Refutation

Joe Pierce, the co-founder of OpenCarry.org, argues that open carry laws benefit public safety in an article he wrote for US News and Report.

1024x1024

Pierce argues is that open carry is not a privilege that the state grants to citizens but a constitutional right. He writes that, “the right to openly bear arms for security and self-defense is enshrined not only in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution but also in a majority of state constitutions.” Pierce asserts that open carry is “very much in keeping with the framers’ view of the constitutional right to bear arms.”

Texas open carry law goes into effectThe Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Constitution has always been interpreted in various ways. There is really no way to know what exactly the founding fathers meant when they wrote about “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” Pierce states, “Today, in a whopping 29 states (that’s a majority for those who are keeping score), any law-abiding citizen who is not prohibited by law from possessing firearms may openly carry with no government permit or license required.”

This is a chilling fact: in nearly three fifths of the country, any law-abiding citizen who isn’t forbidden by law may openly carry a gun without a permit or license. The fact that there is so little regulation already should be a red flag that some regulation is required.

1024x10241Pierce goes on to argue that open carry also provides several benefits for public safety. He writes that “criminals make a large effort to try to hide their weapons, but open carriers wear their firearms properly holstered and go out willing to subject themselves to the scrutiny of their neighbors and of law enforcement.”

Pierce is arguing that having open carried weapons is safer than trying to hide them. We believe that neither is safe. Carrying guns in public, whether concealed or open carry, is inherently dangerous. There are even more opportunities for intentional or unintentional violence to occur. Concealed weapons are a safety risk, but the unregulated open carrying of firearms is an even bigger one!

 

Concealed Carry Killers – an Affirmative Argument

Many people are under the impression that concealed gun carriers are the “good guys,” using their guns only for self-defense, but far too often this is not the case.

usa

Concealed carrying is a problem because it increases crime just as much as it deters it, it can turn confrontations into lethal incidents, it gives dangerous people easy access to firearms, it encourages criminals to carry guns, and it makes non-carrying people vulnerable.

Oregon shooting: Gunman dead after college rampage

Concealed Carry Killers is a resource created and updated by the Violence Policy Center that includes a considerable number of examples of “non-self defense killings by private citizens with permits to carry concealed, loaded handguns in public that took place since May 2007.” As of August 12, 2016, Concealed Carry Killers has recorded “696 concealed carry related incidents in 41 states and the District of Columbia resulting in 885 deaths.”

Concealed guns can turn confrontations into lethal incidents.What starts out as a disagreement, can too easily turn violent or even deadly, if either of the parties have easy access to weapons. Especially if in common places such as movie theaters, bars, or even traffic (and we all know how frustrating rush hour can be)! Take the situation below for example…

Spotlight: Neighborhood shooting in Maryland
4e6f4fa3c2c86-image
“On April 3, 2011, Charles Edward “Pete” Richter Jr., 66, shot and killed his neighbor Mark Xander, 55, after Xander’s Rottweiler went on to Richter’s property. Richter’s defense attorney told a judge deciding bail that Richter had a permit to carry a handgun issued by the Maryland State Police… Read More

Concealed carrying gives dangerous people easy access to firearms. Concealed carry is good in theory, but not so much in reality. If only good, law-abiding citizens were able to obtain permits, there would be no issue. However, there is no way of guaranteeing the intents of other people or that a “good person” will continue to act the same way upon obtaining his or her permit.

The right to concealed carry encourages criminals to carry guns. Criminals will always find ways to obtain weapons, but one of the main reasons that they carry guns is to protect themselves from possible victims who are also armed.

lead_large

Concealed carrying makes non-carrying people vulnerable. This is kind of an obvious one… As a non-armed person in a restaurant or bar, how would you feel knowing that strangers who are armed surrounded you? Most likely you would feel some sort of discomfort. If a fight broke out and everyone started pulling out their guns, what would you do? You would be the most vulnerable person there with no way to defend yourself.

The ability to carry concealed weapons is not as safe as it has been cracked up to be.

“Common Sense” Gun Control Debunked! (Man-On-Street)

Buzzwords like “assault weapon” and “semi-automatic” seem to be all the rage. But what do they mean? More importantly, what do the people pushing for “common sense” gun control and weapon bans think they mean? We find out.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqJ_4YhYMhE

Affirmative Argument

According to the FBI, in 2012, 64% of all gun-related deaths in the U.S. were suicides. In 2010, there were 19,392 firearm-related suicides, and 11,078 firearm-related homicides in the U.S. When people hear the words gun violence they most likely think mass shootings and terrorism and it’s not their fault when they think that way. A big portion of the blame goes to the American media. The media includes the cable news channels, social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook etc. and also the print media. They all focus on the sensationalism of the news to satisfy the audience’s interests and it does not matter if the news is about a humans being slaughtered by a mentally ill individual or a hate group initiated killing. What is more shocking is that with the increase in gun ownership another cause of gun violence has risen namely suicide. In fact suicide by firearms has been around longer than you think but again when you can talk about mass shootings and terrorism who would be interested in a suicide related death? Unless a major celebrity is involved and then there is the opportunity to sensationalize that news.

suicide-by-fire-arms

The Trace, an independent and nonprofit news organization, is also a platform that is dedicated to informing people about the drastic increase in the firearm-related violence in the United States. They believe there is a shortage of information on the issues violence caused by firearms. The article New CDC Report Shows America’s Gun Suicide Problem Getting Worse, published by Katie Masters on www.thetrace.org reports the issue of gun suicide increasing tremendously and thus becoming a huge problem in the U.S. According to Morris M. in 10 Arguments for Gun Control, study after study indicates that suicide is not so much a rational decision, but something people do on the spur of the moment—meaning that a lack of access to a death-shooting murder-stick at that critical moment could be the difference between life and death. Even more worrying, people who committed suicide were found to be seventeen times more likely to live with guns at home than not.

blogggggg

The CDC raised a concern of the negative role guns play in deaths. According to them, More Americans are killing themselves with guns, with the number of gun suicides rising by 4,735 from 1999 to 2014. The opposition may argue that the studies show a decrease in suicides by death, however they are not looking at the bigger picture. Cathy Barber, a researcher at the Harvard Injury Prevention Training claims that, “In 1999, there were 16,599 suicides committed with a firearm. In 2014, gun suicides totaled 21,334.”

The opposition to gun control states that we should focus on the mentally ill when implementing gun control laws. But my question is, how can law enforcement agencies get access to such a database without violating the individual’s privacy thus making it impossible to have access such data and implement laws to prevent possible gun violence? With the issue of violating privacy, getting access to such data would be considered worse than tracing phones, emails and other personal online activities. The fact is that committing suicide using a gun with easy access is more likely to happen than suicide by swallowing poison or slitting a wrist as it is less painful and quicker way to die.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started